Advanced Search
RSS LinkedIn Twitter

Journal Archive

Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev., 2017, 61, (3), 196

doi:10.1595/205651317x695785

The ‘Nano-to-Nano’ Effect Applied to Organic Synthesis in Water

A remarkable opportunity to use not only water as the reaction medium but very little surfactant and catalyst containing only ppm levels of metal under mild conditions

  • Bruce H. Lipshutz
  • Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
  • Email: lipshutz@chem.ucsb.edu
SHARE THIS PAGE:

Article Synopsis

The remarkable benefits associated with the attraction of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-containing nanomicelles to metal nanoparticles in water allows for varying types of important catalysis to be done under very mild and green conditions.

1. Introduction

Aqueous micellar catalysis is far from new (1, 2). Indeed, although a wealth of information on this topic has been accumulated over many decades (3, 4), an appreciation of the potential for this chemistry to replace organic solvents as the reaction medium in many of the most commonly used reactions in catalysis has only recently been advanced (58). The explanations behind this surprising state of affairs may lie in the lack of training received in this area and the normal mindset among synthetic organic chemists that the presence of water in a reaction, in other than selected cases (for example hydrolysis), is to be avoided. Hence, its use as the entire reaction medium is rarely a consideration. Simply put, organic chemistry takes place in organic solvents and so why ‘complicate’ an already challenging science?

The short answer is that times have changed and as environmental and human health issues continue to come into focus, so must our attention take note that the chemistry enterprise is creating huge amounts of organic waste, the most egregious component of which is organic solvents (9). Getting them out of organic chemistry should be a goal that chemists strive to achieve, as the way this field is currently practiced is just not sustainable. How can it be that there is not a single key reaction parameter associated with the way catalysis is done today that overlaps with the manner in which nature continues to practice organic chemistry (Figure 1)? Fortunately, there is already strong evidence indicating that by redesigning surfactants for synthetic chemistry (58), these form nanomicelles that enable homogeneous catalysis to be efficiently applied to the very same reactions valued by synthetic chemists, but with one major difference: they are done under environmentally responsible conditions.

Fig. 1.

Extent of overlap as practiced by nature vs. modern organic chemistry: none

Extent of overlap as practiced by nature vs. modern organic chemistry: none

The two leading nonionic designer surfactants forming micellar arrays in water that accommodate many differing reaction partners, catalysts and additives are DL-α-tocopherol methoxypolyethylene glycol succinate (TPGS-750-M) (10) and β-sitosterol methoxyethyleneglycol succinate (SPGS-550-M) also known as ‘Nok’ (11) (Figure 2). Both form nanomicelles that, unlike the majority of surfactants typically found in catalogues frequented by the synthetic community, are of the ‘right’ size or shape leading to bond formations that are usually as good or better than those observed in organic media. But what had originally not been fully appreciated is that the methoxy polyethylene glycol (MPEG) (or polyethylene glycol (PEG), in general) present in these 40–60 nm spheres of TPGS-750-M or rods of Nok has a natural tendency to function as a stabilising ligand around metal nanoparticles (NPs) (12, 13) that are also present as catalysts in the water. In other words, generation of metal nanoparticles as catalysts attract the MPEG-containing micelles, which is tantamount to an internal delivery system of the reaction partners housed within the micelles to the catalyst. This ‘nano-to-nano’ effect offers a remarkable opportunity to use not only water as the reaction medium, but very little surfactant and catalyst containing only ppm levels of metal, and to do such heterogeneous catalysis under atypically very mild conditions (between 22ºC and 45ºC).

Fig. 2.

Designer surfactants leading to nanomicelles that participate in ‘nano-to-nano’ effect

Designer surfactants leading to nanomicelles that participate in ‘nano-to-nano’ effect

That this phenomenon is not only happening but also likely to be responsible for the facile catalysis observed is clear from cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) analyses. These data show an unequivocal preponderance of nanomicelles aggregated around metal NPs, whereas in the absence of such NPs an otherwise even distribution of micelles in the surrounding water is seen. While such an association does not prove that the observed catalysis is taking place as proposed, it does document the ‘nano-to-nano’ effect that localises the high concentration of substrate within the micelle directly at the catalyst surface, potentially accounting for the lack of energy (in the form of heat) needed to enhance interactions in these heterogeneous mixtures that otherwise might be needed in organic solvents where no such formal delivery mechanism exists.

2. The ‘Nano-to-Nano’ Effect: Palladium, Nickel and Copper Nanoparticles

2.1 Palladium

The first observation came unexpectedly when Pd NPs were generated from the combination of palladium acetate (Pd(OAc)2) and sodium borohydride (NaBH4) in aqueous TPGS-750-M at room temperature (14). The resulting heterogeneous aqueous mixture could be used to great advantage, converting a variety of unsymmetrically disubstituted alkynes to the corresponding Z-alkenes, typically with >99:1 Z:E selectivity (Figure 3). Part of the success observed in these net Lindlar-like reductions is the facility with which the reaction mixture could be recycled, including the water, the surfactant therein, and the Pd catalyst. Thus, an ‘in-flask’ extraction with an ethereal solvent (for example methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)) afforded the product, leaving behind all other ingredients ready for introduction of the same or an alternative educt, along with fresh reductant. The overall reliance on organic solvents, therefore, was shown to be at least an order of magnitude lower than amounts often required with similar reactions in the literature (15). Moreover, these differences are to be realised prior to recycling of the aqueous mixtures.

Fig. 3.

Representative Lindlar-like reductions of alkynes to Z-olefins (14)

Representative Lindlar-like reductions of alkynes to Z-olefins (14)

A similar ‘nano-to-nano’ effect was seen with new NPs derived from the reduction of iron(III) chloride (FeCl3), where either the naturally occurring content of Pd within FeCl3 or by externally doping with Pd(OAc)2 at the ppm level sufficed to arrive at active catalysts useful for important cross-couplings (Figure 4) (16). That is, given the threshold presence of ca. 350 ppm Pd, NP formation upon treatment of the mixture (i.e., FeCl3 + 350 ppm Pd) with methylmagnesium chloride (MeMgCl) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) at ambient temperatures affords the desired NP catalysts. When prepared in the presence of SPhos, the resulting NPs mediate Suzuki-Miyaura couplings in aqueous nanomicelles between room temperature and 45ºC. Extensive analyses of this isolable powder, including a cryo-TEM experiment conducted on the reaction medium (TPGS-750-M + water) again confirmed the aggregation of nanomicelles together with the solid iron nanoparticles containing ppm levels of palladium (here designated Fe/ppm Pd NPs).

Fig. 4.

Fe/ppm Pd NPs that enable Suzuki-Miyaura couplings in aqueous TPGS-750-M NPs based on the ‘nano-to-nano’ effect (16)

Fe/ppm Pd NPs that enable Suzuki-Miyaura couplings in aqueous TPGS-750-M NPs based on the ‘nano-to-nano’ effect (16)

This newly developed NP platform, consisting of mostly Mg, Cl and THF, with Fe accounting for only ca. 2.5% of the mix, can be altered as a function of the ligand added prior to their preparation. Changing the recipe from inclusion of SPhos to XPhos now allows for efficient ‘nano-to-nano’ catalysis of Sonogashira couplings in the same recyclable aqueous mixtures (Figure 5) (17). Recycling is smoothly orchestrated using very limited amounts of a single and recyclable, organic solvent for ’in flask’ extraction.

Fig. 5.

Fe/ppm Pd NPs used for Sonogashira couplings in aqueous TPGS-750-M (17)

Fe/ppm Pd NPs used for Sonogashira couplings in aqueous TPGS-750-M (17)

These NPs derived from FeCl3 can also be prepared in the absence of any ligand, otherwise required for Pd-catalysed cross-couplings. In this case, the ‘nano-to-nano’ effect can be used to effect reductions of aromatic and heteroaromatic nitro groups in water at room temperature (18, 19). The stoichiometric reductant is NaBH4, although as recently updated at Novartis in Basel, Switzerland, the addition of potassium chloride (KCl) or the use of fresh potassium borohydride (KBH4) appears to be the hydride source of choice (20). Only 80 ppm of palladium (as Pd(OAc)2) is required for these NP reductions, again implicating a palladium hydride species (Figure 6). The mild reaction conditions account for the tolerance of many functional groups. Importantly, use of hydrogen gas in place of a borohydride is totally incompatible with this catalyst and in fact, is detrimental to the overall reduction.

Fig. 6.

Ligandless Fe/ppm Pd NPs applied to nitro group reductions (1820)

Ligandless Fe/ppm Pd NPs applied to nitro group reductions (18–20)

2.2 Nickel

Notwithstanding the reported success of the catalyst (Fe/ppm Pd NPs + BH4) applied to nitro group reductions (above) (18, 19), doping of this NP platform with metals other than Pd offers either additional benefits to existing processes, or potentially new opportunities to lower both base and precious metal usage to ppm levels. Part of the incentive to further investigate along these lines is that the amount of residual metal(s) in the desired products has been found to be below tolerance levels as established by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). That is, going into these reactions with ppm amounts of transition metal catalysts, rather than the more typical 1–5 mol% range (10,000–50,000 ppm), leads to acceptable ppm levels of metal impurities that obviate additional time and cost for their removal, a very common occurrence under traditional conditions in organic solvents. In work soon to appear (21), doping these Fe-based NPs with additional ppm levels of a Ni(II) salt affords a reagent that has been found, likewise, to efficiently reduce nitro group-containing aromatic or heteroaromatic compounds, but often at a far greater rate under otherwise identical conditions of concentration, time and temperature. Figure 7 shows a few comparison cases.

Fig. 7.

Faster reductions with new NPs doped with Ni (21)

Faster reductions with new NPs doped with Ni (21)

2.3 Copper

Another metal used extensively in organic chemistry is copper and hence, doping the iron nanoparticles with ppm levels with a Cu salt, rather than Pd or Ni (Fe/ppm Cu NPs) might form a potentially useful reagent, presumably benefiting from the same ‘nano-to-nano’ effect. Indeed, related NPs are formed using Cu(I) admixed with the same FeCl3, followed by standard treatment with MeMgCl in THF (vide supra). Akin to observations with other NPs in this series, the catalyst can be generated and used in situ or isolated for use at a later date. The first type of catalysis examined has been click chemistry between a terminal alkyne and an azide; when performed in aqueous TPGS-750-M at room temperature, cycloadditions to the anticipated triazoles take place quite readily (22). In addition to representative examples shown in Figure 8, products formed upon recycling of the aqueous reaction mixture are suggestive that the catalyst does not lose its activity when handled under an inert atmosphere to prevent autoxidation to the otherwise inactive Cu(II) form.

Fig. 8.

Representative examples of Fe/ppm Cu NPs applied to click chemistry

Representative examples of Fe/ppm Cu NPs applied to click chemistry

3. Summary

Micellar catalysis has been made highly effective by virtue of newly engineered nanoreactors in water, offering the synthetic community an environmentally responsible alternative to waste-generating organic solvents as reaction media. The green attributes of this approach to synthesis, however, go well beyond this simple solvent switch. In fact, metal NP catalysts present in such aqueous solutions populated by MPEG-containing nonionic surfactants TPGS-750-M and Nok are active under very mild conditions due to this ‘nano-to-nano’ effect, a phenomenon not found in traditional organic solvents. Applications of metal NPs that can be formed containing either base (for example Ni or Cu) or precious (for example Pd) metals to important reaction types, such as reductions and cross-couplings, have been demonstrated. Future developments involving other precious metals, such as rhodium and iridium, seem ripe for investigation, furthering the appeal of this new green chemistry.

BACK TO TOP

References

  1. 1.
    D. Myers, “Surfactant Science and Technology”, 3rd Edn., John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New Jersey, USA, 2006, 400 pp
  2. 2.
    M. N. Khan, “Micellar Catalysis”, Surfactant Science Series, Vol. 133, Taylor & Francis Group LLC, Florida, USA, 2007, 482 pp
  3. 3.
    T. Dwars, E. Paetzold and G. Oehme, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2005, 44, (44), 7174 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501365
  4. 4.
    B. Lindman and H. Wennerström, ‘Amphiphile Aggregation in Aqueous Solution’, in “Micelles”, Topics in Current Chemistry, Vol 87, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 1980, pp. 1–83 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0048488
  5. 5.
    B. H. Lipshutz and S. Ghorai, Green Chem., 2014, 16, (8), 3660 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/C4GC00503A
  6. 6.
    B. H. Lipshutz and S. Ghorai, Aldrichim. Acta, 2012, 45, (1), 3 LINK http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/ifb/acta/v45/acta-vol45-2012.html#5/z
  7. 7.
    B. H. Lipshutz and S. Ghorai, Aldrichim. Acta, 2008, 41, (3), 59 LINK http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/ifb/acta/v41/acta-vol41-2008.html#73/z
  8. 8.
    G. La Sorella, G. Strukul and A. Scarso, Green Chem., 2015, 17, (2), 644 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/C4GC01368A
  9. 9.
    P. J. Dunn, R. K. Henderson, I. Mergelsberg and A. S. Wells, ‘Moving Towards Greener Solvents for Pharmaceutical Manufacturing – An Industry Perspective’, 13th Annual Green Chemistry & Engineering Conference, Maryland, USA, 23rd–25th June, 2009 LINK https://acs.confex.com/acs/green09/webprogram/Paper70091.html
  10. 10.
    B. H. Lipshutz, S. Ghorai, A. R. Abela, R. Moser, T. Nishikata, C. Duplais, A. Krasovskiy, R. D. Gaston and R. C. Gadwood, J. Org. Chem., 2011, 76, (11), 4379 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/jo101974u
  11. 11.
    P. Klumphu and B. H. Lipshutz, J. Org. Chem., 2014, 79, (3), 888 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/jo401744b
  12. 12.
    Z. Hou, N. Theyssen, A. Brinkmann and W. Leitner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2005, 44, (9), 1346 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200461493
  13. 13.
    B. Feng, Z. Hou, H. Yang, X. Wang, Y. Hu, H. Li, Y. Qiao, X. Zhao and Q. Huang, Langmuir, 2010, 26, (4), 2505 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/la9027755
  14. 14.
    E. D. Slack, C. M. Gabriel and B. H. Lipshutz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, (51), 14051 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201407723
  15. 15.
    R. A. Sheldon, Green Chem., 2017, 19, (1), 18 and references therein LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/C6GC02157C
  16. 16.
    S. Handa, Y. Wang, F. Gallou and B. H. Lipshutz, Science, 2015, 349, (6252), 1087 LINK https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac6936
  17. 17.
    S. Handa, Y. Wang, F. Gallou and B. H. Lipshutz, manuscript in preparation
  18. 18.
    J. Feng, S. Handa, F. Gallou and B. H. Lipshutz, Angew. Chem., 2016, 128, (31), 9125 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201604026
  19. 19.
    M. Orlandi, D. Brenna, R. Harms, S. Jost and M. Benaglia, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2016, just accepted manuscript LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.6b00205
  20. 20.
    C. M. Gabriel, M. Parmentier, C. Riegert, M. Lanz, S. Handa, B. H. Lipshutz and F. Gallou, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2017, 21, (2), 247 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.6b00410
  21. 21.
    H. Pang and B. H. Lipshutz, manuscript in preparation
  22. 22.
    A. Adenot, E. B. Landstrom, F. Gallou and B. H. Lipshutz, Green Chem., 2017, 19, (11), 2506 LINK http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7gc00883j
 

The Author


Bruce Lipshutz spent four years at Yale University, USA, (1973–1977) as a graduate student with Harry Wasserman. After a two-year postdoctoral stint with E. J. Corey at Harvard University, USA, as part of the team involved with the total synthesis of the antitumour agent maytansine, he began his academic career at the University of California, Santa Barbara, USA, in 1979, where today he continues as Professor of Chemistry. His programme in synthesis focuses on new reagents and methodologies, mainly in the area of organometallic chemistry. While these contributions tended to fall within the area of ‘traditional’ organic synthesis, more recently his group has shifted in large measure towards the development of new technologies in green chemistry, with the specific goal being to get organic solvents out of organic reactions. To accomplish this, the Lipshutz group has introduced the concept of ‘designer’ surfactants that enable key transition metal-catalysed cross-couplings, and many other reactions, to be carried out in water at room temperature. Most recently, his group has turned its attention to developing new catalysts for key Pd- and Au-catalysed reactions that involve bond formations requiring only parts per million levels of metal, each being conducted in water under very mild conditions. The potential for his group’s work in this field to significantly influence, and in time transform the way in which organic chemistry is practiced in the future, led to a Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Award in 2011.

Read more from this issue »

BACK TO TOP

SHARE THIS PAGE: