Advanced Search
RSS LinkedIn Twitter

Journal Archive

Platinum Metals Rev., 1958, 2, (4), 124

Choosing Catalysts for Selective Behaviour

A Graphical Method of Studying Reactions

  • G. C. B.
SHARE THIS PAGE:

Many of the catalysts that are widely used today are capable of effecting, in addition to the reaction leading to the desired products, side reactions, or subsequent reactions of the desired products, leading to undesired products. The normal procedure for determining the conditions under which the most selective formation of desired products results is a tedious matter, involving the variation in turn of each of the relevant variables. Three recent papers (1, 2, 3) from the laboratory of Professor H. I. Waterman at the Technological University of Delft discuss the theoretical basis and application of a method designed to reduce to a bare minimum the experimentation necessary to gain this information.

Selective Reaction Schemes


There are three possible forms of simultaneous first order reactions.

(i) Consecutive reactions


For processes of this type the following theoretical expression can be derived:

where αA = fraction of A reacted

αB = fraction of initial A converted to B

S = k 1/k 2, the selectivity factor

When αB is plotted against αC (the fraction of initial A converted to C ), the points lie on a curve whose position depends on S. Fig 1 shows the curves for S = 1 and S = 10. We may assume that in this scheme B is the desired product and C undesired; we are therefore interested in obtaining a high selectivity. In Fig 1, points near X will have moderate selectivity but yields of both products will be low. At Y, the selectivity is high and the yield of B is high; at Z, the selectivity is low and the yield of B is low. The high temperature (180°C) hydrogenation of linoleic ester obeys this simple scheme, the efficient selective formation of oleic ester resulting when 2 per cent nickel-kieselguhr is used at 1 atm. pressure.

Fig. 1

Relations between αB and αC at various selectivities (scheme (i))

Relations between αB and αC at various selectivities (scheme (i))

(ii) Simultaneous side reactions


Here again we may assume B is the desired product and C undesired. The theoretical expression is

where the symbols have their former meaning. The relation between αB and αC at various values of S is shown in Fig 2; the points X, Y and Z also have their former significance.

Fig. 2

Relations between αB and αC at various selectivities (scheme (ii))

Relations between αB and αC at various selectivities (scheme (ii))

(iii) Simultaneous reaction of two reactants


Here we may assume is the desired process and the undesired.

The theoretical expression is

where now αA and αC respectively mean the fractions of A and C reacted. The relation between αA and αC at various values of S is shown in Fig 3, in which X, Y and Z have their usual significance.

Fig. 3

Relations between αA and αC at various selectivities (scheme (iii))

Relations between αA and αC at various selectivities (scheme (iii))

A Generalised Treatment


Although as already noted the high temperature hydrogenation of linoleic ester conforms to one of the simple schemes, the reaction at low temperatures (20 to 90°C) does not so conform, due to interference by diffusion phenomena. Thus even in relatively simple cases the above kinetic functions inadequately predict reaction courses. In many practical cases there may be other complicating factors. In scheme (ii), for example, other products besides B and C may be formed; in scheme (iii) there may be more than two reactants; reactions may not be of the first order. Sound and yet tractable kinetic functions are impossible to derive if the system is more complex than those considered above.

A useful empirical device is described to handle the general complex case. The system is regarded as a pseudo-ternary one, in which the components are the fraction of unchanged reactant, the fraction of desired product, ij, and the fraction of by-products, x. These are related empirically by the expression

which is the equation of a hyperbola; a and b are constants. This is the modified form of scheme (i) above. The analogous expression for scheme (iii) is

Here the three components are the reactant A, the reactant C, and the combined products.

The modification of scheme (i) adequately describes the course of reaction (variation of concentrations with time) in the following systems: hydrogenation of natural oils; chlorination of hydrocarbons; the hydro-isomerisation of hydrocarbons; and the isomerisation of methyl oleate. The modification of scheme (ii) satisfactorily describes the hydrotreating of shale gasolines.

The second paper describes in detail the application of the modified scheme (i) to the hydro-isomerisation of paraffin wax. The process resembles catalytic reforming, in that the long hydrocarbon molecules are treated with hydrogen in the presence of a catalyst, becoming highly branched: the desired products are then low pour point lubricating oils. Some undesired cracking to products boiling below 300°C also occurs. Thus the wax (A ) leads to the desired product (B =oil) and to the undesired product (C =cracked products).

Using various types of platinum-alumina catalysts, the effect of several variables on the concentrations can be described by the same hyperbolic curve of Fig 4. The maximum oil yield attainable is about 68 per cent, with about 20 per cent cracked products (point X); the conversion is therefore about 88 per cent and S is about 3.5. A higher selectivity can be obtained by sacrificing the total yield; thus at point Y, the oil yield is 50 per cent, the cracked products yield is only 5 per cent (the conversion is therefore 55 per cent), and S is 10. The effect of operating variables for a given catalyst is shown in the second paper; the highest oil yield occurs at 425°C and with a H2/wax molar ratio of about 50. The selectivity increases with the age of the catalyst and with its platinum and chlorine content. Replacing chloride by fluorine produces an entirely non-selective catalyst.

Fig. 4

Relation between oil yield and cracked products yield for platinum catalysts in paraffin wax isomerisation

Relation between oil yield and cracked products yield for platinum catalysts in paraffin wax isomerisation

Screening Catalysts for Selective Behaviour


The advantage of considering chemical reactions capable of showing selectivity as pseudo-ternary systems now becomes apparent. The merit or demerit of any catalyst can largely be determined from the result of only one experiment performed under standard conditions. Consider the extreme cases shown in Figs. 5 and 6: through the one experimental point, lines are drawn through the points M and N. All the possible hyperbolas which could result from variation of any one of the operating conditions must lie within the shaded areas. Thus in Fig 5, where the catalyst is Al2O3 alone, the maximum possible oil yield at 100 per cent conversion is about 30 per cent and S is about whereas at the other extreme in Fig 6 (where the catalyst is platinum on alumina containing chlorine) the maximum oil yield at 100 per cent conversion is greater than 90 per cent and S is infinity. The standard operating conditions are: 435°C, 51 atm., WHSV =0.97 and a H2/wax molar ratio of 94. Therefore on the basis of only one experiment it is confidently predicted that variation of any of these conditions will never result in a highly selective performance by Al2O3 alone, whereas, for example, lowering the temperature with the Pt−Al2O3−Cl catalyst may cause it to show a high selectivity.

Fig. 5

Screening diagram for Al2O3 in paraffin wax isomerisation

Screening diagram for Al2O3 in paraffin wax isomerisation

Fig. 6

Screening diagram for Pt−Al2O3−Cl in paraffin wax isomerisation

Screening diagram for Pt−Al2O3−Cl in paraffin wax isomerisation

On the basis of the results shown in the second paper the order of expected selectivity for various catalysts is Pt−Al2O3−Cl>MoO3−Al2O3−F = CoMoO4−Al2O3>Pt−SiO2−Cl>Al2O3−Cl = Al2O3. The authors believe the method can be developed into a more general, efficient means of screening catalysts and evaluating reactions in which selectivity is involved.

BACK TO TOP

References

  1. 1
    H. I. Waterman and A. B. R. Weber J. Inst. Petroleum, 1957, 43, 315 – 322
  2. 2
    H. Breimer,, H. I. Waterman and A. B. R. Weber Ibid., 299 – 306
  3. 3
    H. I. Waterman,, C. Boelhouwer and J. Cornelissen Anal. Chim. Acta, 1958, 18, (5), 497 – 507
 

Read more from this issue »

BACK TO TOP

SHARE THIS PAGE: