Advanced Search
RSS LinkedIn Twitter

Journal Archive

Platinum Metals Rev., 1991, 35, (4), 202

Recovery of Platinum Group Metals from High Level Radioactive Waste

Possibilities of Separation and use Re-Evaluated

  • By R. P. Bush
  • AEA Technology, Harwell Laboratory, Oxfordshire, England

Article Synopsis

When nuclear fuel is irradiated in a power reactor a wide range of chemical elements is created by the fission of uranium and plutonium. These fission products include palladium, rhodium and ruthenium, and could in principle constitute a valuable source of these three metals. Their separation front the fuel during reprocessing operations is, however, a complex mutter. Various processes have been proposed and evaluated, mainly on a laboratory scale. To date none of them has been established as applicable on a commercial scale, but investigations with this aim are continuing in several countries. Even a complete separation of the platinum group metals from other nuclides would yield a radioactive product, because of the presence of active isotopes of the platinum group metals. These would be expected to restrict the practical utilisation of platinum group metals created by nuclear fission, unless an isotope separation technique can be developed, or the metals are stored until the radioactivity has decayed.

The irradiation of nuclear fuels in power reactors leads to the production of atoms of a wide range of fission products, ranging in atomic mass from 70 to 160. These fission products generally constitute components of the radioactive waste generated by the nuclear fuel cycle. They include three of the platinum group metals, namely palladium, rhodium and ruthenium, which are valuable because of their scarcity and their strategic importance.

It is the purpose of this paper to review the quantities of the platinum group elements produced (frequently termed the arisings) during nuclear power generation, to describe their behaviour within the fuel cycle, and to consider the feasibility of separating them from suitable waste streams and utilising them industrially.

The question of whether these metals might be separated from nuclear wastes was considered in the early days of the nuclear industry, and interest in it has re-emerged at intervals since then. The topic was previously reviewed in Platinum Metals Review in 1970 (1). The current revival of interest has resulted partly because of the increasing economic importance of rhodium. This metal is a crucial component of the three-way catalysts used for automobile emission control, and the demand for it is therefore strong. However, rhodium is mined in conjunction with platinum and its supply is therefore linked to that of platinum. Increases in the price of rhodium over the last few years have led to renewed interest in possible new sources. For this reason, the present paper concentrates on recent technological developments that might have a bearing on the separation of rhodium from nuclear waste.

Production of Platinum Metals in Nuclear Fuel

Palladium, rhodium and ruthenium are produced in irradiated fuel at fission yields of a few per cent. The quantities produced depend on the type of reactor system and on the burn-up to which the fuel is taken, that is the thermal energy generated by fission by unit mass of fuel. In a commercial light water reactor at a burn-up of 33GWd/te about 4 kg of platinum group metals are produced per tonne of heavy metal in the fuel. In a fast breeder reactor, because of the higher burn-up (about 100GWd/te) and the different neutron spectrum, about 19 kg of platinum group metals per tonne are produced. For light water reactor fuel, the approximate composition of the platinum group metals fraction is: palladium 33, rhodium 11 and ruthenium 56 per cent. Rhodium, currently the most valuable of the three, is generated in the lowest yield.

The isotopic composition of the fission derived platinum group metals is different from that of the natural metals; and it varies over time as the fuel cools, because the radioactive isotopes present are subject to decay. At the time of discharge from the reactor a number of very short lived isotopes are present, but these decay rapidly. The composition after about five years is shown in Table I. With longer times the composition and the total masses of the elements present do not vary significantly, apart from the conversion of 106Ru to 106Pd.

Table I

Composition of Fission Product Platinum Croup Metals after Cooling for Five Years

IsotopeContent, weight per centHalf-lifeSpecific(a) activity, Ci/g metalDecay mode
99 trace stable    
100 4.2 stable    
101 34.1 stable    
102 34.0 stable    
103 trace 39 days Low βγ
104 23.9 stable    
106 3.8 368 days 8 Low energy β
102 trace 2.9 years 1.3 × 10–3 γ, electron capture
102m trace 207 days 3 × 10–5 βγ, electron capture
103 100 stable    
106(b) trace 30 seconds (8) Βγ
104 16.9 stable    
105 29.3 stable    
106 21.3 stable    
107 17.0 6.5 × 105 years 5 × 10–5 Low energy β
108 11.7 stable    
110 3.8 stable    

1 Curie (Ci) 3.7 × 1010 Becquerel

106 Rh exists in secular equilibrium with 106Ru, and decays rapidly to 106Pd

Some of the isotopes shown in Table I are only present at low mass concentrations, but they are important because they impart radioactivity to the metal. This radioactivity has important implications for the potential utilisation of the metals, even if they were separated. We shall return to this point later in the paper.

In order to obtain an idea of the potential platinum group metals resource in nuclear fuel, it is necessary to consider the size of present and future nuclear power programmes. It is possible to estimate the total world arisings of fission product platinum group metals from their fission yields and the expected arisings of spent fuel based on forecasts from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and others. Light water reactor data can be used for the calculation because this type of reactor will dominate the nuclear power programmes for the world as a whole. In Table II the arisings based on one set of assumptions (2) are compared with annual consumption in the World Outside Centrally-Planned Economies Area (WOCA), and with 1982 estimates of the world reserves. Full details of the calculations are given elsewhere (2).

Table II

Comparison of Projected Arisings of Fission Product Platinum Group Metals with Natural Reserves and Annual Consumption,


Fission product arisingRutheniumRhodiumPalladium
2000 364 71 218
2030 1423 280 850
Natural reserves (1982) 3220 770 8520
Annual consumption in WOCA (1986) 7.4 8.4 92.0

The data show that nuclear arisings of the platinum group metals are potentially a significant fraction of reserves, and represent many years consumption at current rates. However, the platinum group metals content of the fission product of spent fuel is not immediately available to man. For the metals to become attainable it is necessary for the fuel to be reprocessed. It is thought likely that about half the nuclear fuel from power reactors worldwide will be reprocessed (2).

Behaviour of Platinum Group Metals during Fuel Processing

When spent nuclear fuel is reprocessed, the fuel pins are sheared into short lengths, and the fuel is dissolved away from the cladding into 7M nitric acid. During this operation, the uranium and plutonium oxides that are present dissolve, as do most of the fission products.

There is, however, an insoluble residue which contains some of the platinum group metals. The acid solution is clarified and then passes to a sequence of solvent extraction contactors in which separation of uranium and plutonium from the fission products, and from each other, is carried out. Most of the fission products in the dissolver solution, including the platinum group metals, pass to the aqueous raffinate from the first solvent extraction cycle. This raffinate is subsequently concentrated by evaporation to give high level waste liquor, which is then stored prior to vitrification and final disposal. During these stages further precipitation of insoluble material can occur.

Insoluble Residues

The insoluble material from the dissolution stage contains 70 to 90 per cent fission products, together with miscellaneous residues and traces of undissolved actinides. These fission products exist as metallic alloys containing molybdenum and technetium as well as palladium, rhodium and ruthenium. About 4 to 5 kg of residues per tonne of fuel have been found in small scale tests, and fine material (<50 μ m) is present. The amounts and compositions are variable, and the residues are intensely radioactive, with heat outputs of up to lW/g.

The fraction of the initial inventory of platinum group metals which occurs in the insoluble residues depends on the burn-up to which the fuel has been taken. For high burn-up fast reactor fuel, about 98 per cent of the total expected ruthenium has been found in the residues (3).

The insoluble residues are difficult to treat chemically because of their inertness, and their high radioactivity adds to the difficulty and expense of processing them. Direct high temperature chlorination, or alloying with tin, has been used to bring the residues into solution for analytical purposes (4). It is unlikely, however, that such methods could be scaled up economically.

High temperature processes that are based on extraction with liquid metals have been proposed. For example, molten uranium/chromium or uranium/iron eutectics extract ruthenium selectively from a solution of the residues in molten magnesium (5). More recently, Japanese investigations have shown that treatment of the residues with lead and a glass-forming material causes extraction of the platinum group metals together with technetium and molybdenum, into the lead phase, leaving other impurities in the glass (6).

Recovery from High Level Liquid Waste

For thermal reactor fuel, which is the commonest type, about two thirds of the platinum group metals are found in the high level liquid waste, and various methods have been suggested for their separation and recovery. The range of the chemical elements present in high level liquid waste spans most Groups in the Periodic Table and the chemical problems of separation are in themselves difficult. Constraints are imposed by the presence of nitric acid (3M in the raffinate). In addition the solutions are radioactive and can only be processed in heavily shielded, and therefore expensive, plant. If the products are to be suitable for general use the separation from other radioactive fission products, for example, caesium-137 must be essentially complete. The platinum group metals also have intrinsic radioactivity of their own, and the implications of this will be discussed later. These factors will make it very difficult to devise an economic separation route, even at the relatively high market values of the platinum group metals. Over the past three decades, several approaches have been suggested in the literature, but none of them has yet demonstrated the potential for application on a commercial scale. In the following paragraphs some recent advances in separation technology that might be applied to the problem are briefly discussed.


Ruthenium can be separated from other metals in nitric acid solutions by oxidising it to the volatile tetroxide, for example with potassium periodate (2). From the data in Table I, it is clear that ruthenium-106 and its daughter rhodium-106 are the main contributors to the radioactivity of the platinum group metals fraction. The separation of ruthenium from rhodium and palladium might therefore be a worthwhile objective, perhaps as a preliminary step to the purification of the rhodium and palladium. It would be difficult, however, to achieve the necessary radiochemical decontamination by an oxidative distillation process.

Solvent Extraction Methods

Solvent extraction methods could have potential for the extraction of rhodium and palladium. The selection of suitable extraction reagents requires consideration of the speciation and co-ordination chemistry of these metals in nitric acid solutions. Patel and co-workers have studied rhodium speciation in nitric acid solutions (7). Hydrated cations, principally [Rh(H2O)6]3+ are typically present, but in the presence of nitrite ion successive substitution of the water ligands can occur, giving species of the general formula [Rh(H2O)6 –n(NO2)n](3–n)+ and ultimately the hexanitrito complex [Rh(NO2)6]3 –. Anionic species would be expected to be extracted by basic extractants such as amines, and Beer has demonstrated efficient and rapid extraction of rhodium by long-chain aliphatic amines from nitrite/nitric acid systems in the presence of salting-out reagents (8).

Amine extractants, however, are generally used in the acidity range pH 2–4. In contrast, high level waste contains 1.5 to 3M nitric acid, and its neutralisation before treatment would pose additional process problems.

More recently Davis and co-workers have extracted palladium with a good degree of selectivity from synthetic fission product solutions in 3M nitric acid, using the tertiary amine Alamine 336 in tributyl phosphate/kerosene (9).

Other systems for rhodium extraction have also been reported but suffer from various disadvantages. For example, a hydrocarbon solution of the cation exchanger dinonylnaphthalene sulphonic acid can be used as an extractant (10); backwashing is readily achieved with nitric acid or with a nitrite solution.

Note: Bar lines indicate species in the organic phase; HD represents dinonylnaphthalene sulphonic acid.

The extraction mechanism here depends not on ligand exchange, which is generally slow for rhodium, but on inclusion in the micelle structures formed by association of the extractant in the hydrocarbon phase. Rhodium extraction is therefore rapid, but the reagent is not selective for rhodium.

Better selectivity for noble metals can be obtained with extractants containing “soft” donor atoms, such as sulphur. The extraction of palladium (11) and rhodium (12) by dialkyl sulphides is well known; but equilibration times for extraction are long (a few hours) making these extractants unsuitable for continuous counter-current solvent extraction processes.

Substituted phosphine sulphides are another potentially useful class of reagents. Alkyl phosphorothioic triamides, (RNH)3PS, extract a variety of metals, including palladium (13), from mineral acid solutions. For rhodium extraction from nitric acid media by the reagents R3PS, when R = phenyl, butyl or C6H13NH, a fairly polar diluent, such as heptanol, is required; extraction is most efficient for the case where R = C6H13NH and at 2 to 3M nitric acid; and equilibration times are long (3 to 6 hours) (14). The last of these factors suggests the need for a batch extraction process, rather than continuous counter-current extraction, but the efficiency is not high enough to allow a satisfactory recovery by such a method. Tertiary phosphine sulphides (15) and oxides (16) have also been used to extract palladium.

By careful choice of conditions, solvent extraction, with a sulphur based extractant, might be used to separate rhodium and palladium from high level liquid waste, but selectivity would be difficult to achieve. The processes would tend to be relatively complex, and plant costs would inevitably be high because of the shielding and remote handling equipment required for dealing with the fission product solutions. None of the processes discussed can currently be regarded as economically viable candidates for industrial use.

Utilisation of Fission-Derived Platinum Group Metals

If a perfect chemical separation of the platinum group metals from other fission products and from each other could be carried out, the products obtained would still be radioactive because of the presence of active isotopes of the metals themselves, see Table I. This fact places severe restrictions on where and how the separated metals might be used, because of the obvious need to limit radiation doses to workers and to the general public. There is also a danger that if the radioactive metals from fission sources became mixed with material from natural sources, for example during metal recycling processes, the whole inventory of these naturally occurring metals could become contaminated with radioactivity.


Ruthenium separated after cooling for five years would contain 3.8 per cent of 106Ru, giving it a specific activity of 8 Ci/g. 106Ru is a low-energy β emitter, but its daughter 106 Rh emits high-energy γ rays and has a half-life of 30 seconds. Whenever 106Ru is present, an equal activity of 106Rh exists in equilibrium with it. Such ruthenium is clearly not suitable for widespread application. The metal would become essentially inactive after cooling for 30 to 50 years, but this long wait would involve economic penalties.

Ruthenium is the lowest priced of the three platinum group metals under consideration (17). It is used mainly in electrical applications and as an electrode material. It is not feasible that fission product ruthenium will be separated and used unless there is a dramatic change in the present situation.


Rhodium is an essential component of three-way catalyst systems for the control of automobile exhaust emissions, an application which accounts for 70 per cent of rhodium usage. Expanding demand for this application has led to steep rises in the price of rhodium.

This situation makes rhodium an attractive candidate for separation. In the complete absence of ruthenium, rhodium would be free of 106Rh. However, the isotopes 102Rh and 102mRh, although insignificant in mass terms, are sufficient to give separated rhodium a specific activity which is too high for general use in the motor industry, see Table I. A cooling period of about 50 years would remove the activity. Alternatively, isotopic separation processes could be considered.

Even at the high market value of rhodium, economic separation and use of fission-derived material does not appear likely with the currently available technology.


The half-life of the active palladium isotope present in the fission-derived metal is so long (0.65 million years) that its activity is effectively permanent.

In addition, palladium is not as rare as the other platinum group metals, Table II, and currently it is relatively modestly priced (17). For these reasons its separation from high level liquid waste will tend to be unattractive.


The quantities of the three platinum group metals, palladium, rhodium and ruthenium, present in irradiated nuclear fuel are sufficient to constitute a useful resource of these important metals. This is particularly true of rhodium, which is currently of great strategic and economic importance because of its use in vehicle exhaust emission control catalysts.

Progress has been made on the development of chemical methods for extracting the platinum group metals from nuclear waste, but the chemical complexity and high radioactivity of the materials involved make it very difficult to devise an economically attractive process.

Even if completely separated chemically from other fission products, platinum group metals derived from nuclear fuel would remain intrinsically radioactive. This would place a severe restriction on their utilisation, unless they were first stored for a period of say 50 years to allow the activity to decay sufficiently.



  1. 1
    R. J. Newman and F. J. Smith, Platinum Metals Rev., 1970, 14, (3), 88
  2. 2
    “Feasibility of Separation and Utilisation of Ruthenium, Rhodium and Palladium from High Level Wastes”, IAEA Technical Report Series 308, IAEA, Vienna 1989
  3. 3
    D. E. Benker,, J. E. Bigelow,, W. D. Bond,, D. O. Campbell,, F. R. Chaltin,, D. J. Crouse,, R. L. Fellows,, L. J. King,, F. G. Kitts,, J. C. Mailen,, R. G. Ross and R. G. Stacy, “Nuclear: Energy of Today and Tomorrow”, ENC 86 Transactions, 1986, 4, 109
  4. 4
    H. T. Baker,, P. E. Brown,, R. J. Pateman and K. L. Wilkinson, “The Characterisation of Insoluble Dissolver Residues and the Development of Treatment Methods”, 1986, CEC report EUR 10823 EN
  5. 5
    F. J. Smith and H. F. McDuffie, Sep. Sci. Technol., 1981, 16, 1071
  6. 6
    K. Naito,, T. Matsui and Y. Tanaka, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 1986, 23, 540
  7. 7
    N. M. Patel, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Loughborough, 1985
  8. 8
    M. Beer,, B. Girski and L. Russ, East German Patent 205,620; 1982
  9. 9
    R. G. Schuler,, C. B. Bowers,, J. E. Smith,, V. Van Brunt and M. W. Davis, Polyhedron, 1987, 6, 1125
  10. 10
    N. M. Patel and J. R. Thornback, “Extraction ‘87”, Institute of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series no. 103, 1987
  11. 11
    J. E. Barnes and J. D. Edwards, Chem. Ind., 1982, 151
  12. 12
    P. A. Lewis,, D. F. C. Morris,, E. L. Short and D. N. Waters, J. Less-Common Metals, 1976, 45, 193
  13. 13
    T. H. Handley, Anal. Chem., 1964, 36, 2467
  14. 14
    I. Longden,, N. M. Patel,, J. R. Thornback and J. H. Miles, Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 1986, 4, (3), 421
  15. 15
    S. Daamach,, G. Cote and D. Bauer, C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 1987, 304, 889 Y. Baba,, M. Oshima and K. Inoue, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1986, 59, 3829
  16. 16
    V. P. Popik and B. N. Zaitsev, “Back End of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Strategies and Options”, Proceedings of IAEA Symposium, Vienna, 1987, p. 554
  17. 11
    Johnson Matthey P.L.C., “Platinum 1987” and subsequent issues


The author thanks numerous associates in AEA Technology, British Nuclear Fuels plc and Johnson Matthey for stimulating exchanges of information on the subject of this paper.

Read more from this issue »